.

Antique cars and trucks along the roadside, Montana: photo by Carol M. Highsmith, 29 September 2005 (Library of Congress)
For  a theoretical account of the category of progress it is necessary to  scrutinize the category so closely that it loses its semblance of  obviousness, both in its positive and its negative usage. And yet such  proximity also makes the account more difficult.  Even more than other concepts, the concept of progress dissolves upon  attempts to specify its exact meaning, for instance what progresses and  what does not. Whoever wants to define the concept precisely easily  destroys what he is aiming at. The subaltern prudence that refuses to  speak of progress before it can distinguish progress in what, of what,  and in relation to what, displaces the unity of the moments, which  within the concept ritually elaborate each other, into a mere  juxtaposition. By insisting on exactitude where the impossibility of the  unambiguous appertains to the subject matter itself, dogmatic  epistemology misses its object, sabotages insight and helps to  perpetuate  the bad by zealously forbidding reflection upon what, in the age of  both utopian and absolutely destructive possibilities, the consciousness  of those entangled would like to discover: whether there is progress.  Like every philosophical term, 'progress' has its equivocations; and as  in any such term, these equivocations also register a commonality. What  at this time one should understand by 'progress' one knows vaguely, but  precisely: for just this reason one cannot employ the concept roughly  enough. To use the term pedantically merely cheats it out of what it  promises: an answer to the doubt and the hope that things will finally  get better, that people will at last be able to breathe a sigh of  relief.  For this reason alone one cannot say precisely what progress should  mean to people, because the crisis of the situation is that precisely  while everyone feels the crisis, the words bringing resolution are  missing. Only those reflections about progress have truth that immerse  themselves in progress and yet maintain distance, withdrawing from  paralyzing facts and specialized meanings. Today reflections of this  kind come to a point in the contemplation of whether humanity is capable  of preventing catastrophe. The forms of humanity's own global societal  constitution threaten its life, if a self-conscious global subject does  not develop and intervene.

Antique trucks along the road, Montana: photo by Carol M. Highsmith, 29 September 2005 (Library of Congress)
Theodor Adorno: excerpt from Progress, Lecture at Münster Philosophers' Congress, 22 October 1962, translated by Henry Pickford in Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords, 1998
 
 
 
4 comments:
pee est my first truck a used 1951 5-window Dodge pick-em-me-up truck.
bought it used in 1971 for $50 up in Hanover when I moved up to that farm to restore that old house...
see, "Restoration Poems"
what a TANK... I should have restored the truck instead of writing a book about restoring that house
Tom,
"insisting on exactitude where the impossibility of the unambiguous appertains to the subject matter itself" --
2.10
pale orange of sky above shadowed black
plane of trees, red-tailed hawk calling
in foreground, sound of wave in channel
everywhere in it only ‘now’,
being not in sequence
by means of starting points,
dotted lines, present
sunlight reflected in windblown channel,
cloudless blue sky to the left of point
"insisting on exactitude where the impossibility of the unambiguous appertains to the subject matter itself" --
always thought progress a matter
of doubtful luck,
everywhere in it only ‘now’,
being not in sequence
by means of starting points,
dotted lines, present
a used 1951 5-window
Dodge pick-em-me-up truck.
country song
"trust in God
luck and
pickup trucks"
that's half gallows laugh
Post a Comment