Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras, Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy, British Prime Minister David Cameron, Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt, European Union foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini, Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Malian President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita, French President Francois Hollande, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, European Union President Donald Tusk, Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, Jordan's Queen Rania, Jordan's King Abdullah II, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and other guests march during the Unity rally, Paris: photo by Dominique Faget/AFP, 11 January 2015
RWB condemns presence of "predators" in Paris march, calls for solidarity with "all Charlies": Reporters Without Borders, 11 January 2015
Reporters Without Borders welcomes the
participation of many foreign leaders in today’s march in Paris in
homage to the victims of last week’s terror attacks and in defence of
the French republic’s values, but is outraged by the presence of
officials from countries that restrict freedom of information.
On what grounds are representatives of regimes that are predators of press freedom coming to Paris to pay tribute to Charlie Hebdo, a publication that has always defended the most radical concept of freedom of expression?
Reporters Without Borders is appalled by the presence of
leaders from countries where journalists and bloggers are
systematically persecuted such as Egypt (which is ranked 159th out of
180 countries in RWB’s press freedom index), Russia (148th), Turkey
(154th) and United Arab Emirates (118th).
“We must demonstrate our solidarity with Charlie Hebdo without forgetting all the world’s other Charlies,” Reporters Without Borders secretary-general Christophe Deloire said.
“It would be unacceptable if representatives of
countries that silence journalists were to take advantage of the current
outpouring of emotion to try to improve their international image and
then continue their repressive policies when they return home. We must
not let predators of press freedom spit on the graves of Charlie Hebdo.”
The authorities have announced the presence of Turkish
Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Egyptian foreign minister Sameh Shoukry,
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, Algerian foreign minister
Ramtane Lamamra, UAE foreign minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al
Nahyan and Gabonese President Ali Bongo.
Unity March, Paris: photo by Associated Press, 11 January 2015
The more the photograph of the world leaders gathering in Paris is analyzed the more it reveals itself as a deeply conflicted sign. The visual rhetoric it exercises has less to do with a stance for freedom of speech than it does with the PR machinations of individuals attending a photo opportunity. And what about that tripartite motto of the French Revolution that was so beautifully displayed by the masses that day? Of those heads of state attending the photo opportunity, how many of them lead deeply autocratic regimes where civil liberties are routinely ignored? How many of them lead nations where equality –- whether it is with regards to gender, religion or caste -– is actually considered illegal? How many of them lead nations that are involved in territorial disputes or even war with neighbors in, what is supposed to be, a brotherhood of nations? For that brief moment, while walking on a cordoned off street in Paris, world leaders where united, whereas business as usual will resume shortly.
Marco Bohr is a photographer, academic and researcher in visual culture
Deconstructing the Photograph of World Leaders at the Paris March: Marco Bohr, Photoworks, 26 January 2015
In the aftermath of the attacks on the Charlie Hebdo
office and a kosher supermarket in Paris, the coming together of world
leaders at the unity march in the French capital constituted a
remarkable event in world history.
Rarely before have so many heads of state been at the
same place at the same time for an event other than a meeting at the UN
or for the G7/8 and G20 summits. Photographs of the world leaders
standing literally and figuratively shoulder-to-shoulder with Françoise
Hollande attempt to emphasize a sense of solidarity with the French
people. Behind this group of powerful leaders, or so the viewer assumes,
were millions of people marching in remembrance of the victims and to
honor the tripartite motto that underpins the French Republic.
On that day photography played a crucial function in not just
documenting the march and the almost unique coming together of world
leaders, but also by creating a visual rhetoric for freedom of speech
and against terrorism. The photograph of world leaders is meant to
suggest that they stand up against terrorism and that they are willing
to defend the values of a democracy. In that sense the photograph of
world leaders is in itself a ‘document’ for democratic values -– a
document signed by Françoise Hollande positioned in the centre of the
image and counter-signed by the heads of state and dignitaries standing
behind and next to him.
The symbolic importance of this photograph could be measured as soon
it was shared online and in the media. In particular, the absence of a
representative from the United States (other than the ambassador to
France) was interpreted as a ‘snub’ by the global media. Let's not forget
that France is the oldest ally of the United States. In the following
days The White House effectively admitted that it was caught off guard
for not sending a higher ranked person if not President Obama himself.
Not even the US Attorney General Eric Holder, who was in Paris at the
time, attended the march.
Though, is this furore based on the fact that Obama should have been
at the march, or is it, more accurately, a question of whether he should
have been at a photo opportunity? The latter should not be conflated
with the former even if both are directly related to each other. The
furore surrounding America’s ‘snub’ alludes to the power of photography
in this type of context: that it provides a form of irrefutable evidence
for non-attendance. One must wonder whether the same questions would
have emerged if the world leaders were not photographed at all -– if they
just quietly and discreetly participated in the march. In the absence
of a group photograph would anyone have really noticed Eric Holder
missing?
Another aspect that attracted scrutiny was the impression provided by
the photograph that heads of state were leading the march. This
impression is created by the vantage point of the camera at the same
height of the people depicted in the image. In that sense the photograph
alludes to the notion of égalité as the viewer assumes that the world
leaders and the people were marching together -– as equals. Yet as TV
footage of the gathering indicates, nothing could be further from the
truth: world leaders were standing in a side street that was cordoned
off from the main march. Quite clearly they are not equals, and they are
not marching together with the people of France that day.
Further scrutiny at the world leaders who did attend the photo
opportunity also raises question about what exactly the common cause is
that they stand for. Daniel Wickham, a politics student at the London
School of Economics, tweeted about the hypocrisy of a wide range of
world leaders attending a march that is presumably fighting for the
freedom of speech. Wickham highlighted the attendance of the prime
minister of Turkey, which imprisons more journalists than any other
country in the world, or the foreign minister of Bahrain, which has the
second highest per capita rate of imprisoning journalists. Wickham’s
series of tweets ends with pointing out the moral and ethical
contradiction provided by the attendance of the foreign minister of
Saudi Arabia –- a country where the human rights activist and blogger
Raif Badawi is periodically flogged in public while serving a ten-year
prison sentence.
The more the photograph of the world leaders gathering in Paris is analyzed the more it reveals itself as a deeply conflicted sign. The visual rhetoric it exercises has less to do with a stance for freedom of speech than it does with the PR machinations of individuals attending a photo opportunity. And what about that tripartite motto of the French Revolution that was so beautifully displayed by the masses that day? Of those heads of state attending the photo opportunity, how many of them lead deeply autocratic regimes where civil liberties are routinely ignored? How many of them lead nations where equality –- whether it is with regards to gender, religion or caste -– is actually considered illegal? How many of them lead nations that are involved in territorial disputes or even war with neighbors in, what is supposed to be, a brotherhood of nations? For that brief moment, while walking on a cordoned off street in Paris, world leaders where united, whereas business as usual will resume shortly.
Marco Bohr is a photographer, academic and researcher in visual culture
France Attacks Rally, 11 January 2015: photo by Associated Press via Photoworks, 26 January 2015
Pen-Ultimate Paris Unity March for Freedom 2015, Place de la République, Paris: photo by DB Young, 11 January 2015
Silent march of world leaders through Paris in honor of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo: photo by Kenji Tribouillard/AP, 11 January 2015; image via European External Action Service, 13 January 2015
March of world leaders through Paris in honor of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo, front row: image via European External Action Service, 11 January 2015
Silent march of world leaders through Paris in honor of the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo: photo by Julien Warnand/European Pressphoto Agency, 11 January 2015; image via FuTurXTV, 30 January 2015
"Circus of Hypocrisy": Jeremy Scahill on How World Leaders at Paris March Oppose Press Freedom: Democracy Now! January 12, 2015
AMY GOODMAN: Let’s talk about this latest news out of France.
JEREMY SCAHILL:
Yeah, well, I mean, first of all, you know, what we saw yesterday on
display, on the one hand, was very heartening, to see so many people
come into the streets. And, you know, one of the core issues of press
freedom, if this is a moment where the whole world is saying we have to
have a free press, and that no matter how controversial or hateful some
of the speech is or may be interpreted in some communities, that we
judge a free press by how we treat the journalists or the stories that
we don’t like or that we’re offended by.
But on the other hand, this is sort of a circus of hypocrisy when it
comes to all of those world leaders who were marching at the front of
it. I mean, every single one of those heads of state or representatives
of governments there have waged their own wars against journalists. You
know, David Cameron ordered The Guardian to smash with a hammer the hard drives that stored the files of NSA
whistleblower Edward Snowden. Blasphemy is considered a crime in
Ireland. You had multiple African and Arab leaders whose own countries
right now have scores of journalists in prison. Benjamin Netanyahu’s
government in Israel has targeted for killing numerous journalists who
have reported on the Palestinian side, have kidnapped, abducted, jailed
journalists. You know, there’s this controversy right now: Why didn’t
President Obama go, or why didn’t Joe Biden go? You know, Eric Holder
was there already and was representing the United States.
I think that we should remember -- and I was saying this on Twitter over
the weekend -- that Yemen should have sent the Yemeni journalist Abdulelah
Haider Shaye as their representative. He, of course, was in prison for
years on the direct orders of President Obama for having reported on
secret U.S. strikes in Yemen that killed scores of civilians. Or Sudan
should have sent Sami al-Hajj, the Al Jazeera cameraman who was held for
six years without charge in Guantánamo and repeatedly interrogated by
U.S. operatives who were intent on proving that Al Jazeera had some sort
of a link to al-Qaeda. So, you know, while there is much to take heart
in, in terms of this huge outpouring of support for freedom of the
press, hypocrisy was on full display in the streets of Paris when it
came to the world leaders.
AMY GOODMAN:
Reporters Without Borders issued a statement saying it, quote,
"condemns [the] presence of 'predators' in [the] Paris march," and,
quote, "is appalled by the presence of leaders from countries where
journalists and bloggers are systematically persecuted such as Egypt ...
Russia ... Turkey ... and United Arab Emirates." A Gabonese journalist
covering the march expressed similar reservations about his president,
Ali Bongo Ondimba, participating in the event.
GABONESE JOURNALIST: [translated] He banned demonstrations in his own country and is coming to a demonstration in France. That’s intolerable for us. It’s a complete hypocrisy. We’re here not only to show our outrage for what happened to Charlie Hebdo, but also to show our outrage over the fact that dictators like Ali Bongo Ondimba are present here in Paris, in a country that supports human rights, at an assembly that is in fact dedicated to freedom of expression, freedom of the press.
AMY GOODMAN: That, a Gabonese journalist covering the march, expressing reservations about his president participating in the march, Jeremy.
JEREMY SCAHILL:
Well, and then you have—you know, you have General Sisi, the dictator
of Egypt, who apparently is showing his solidarity for press freedom by
continuing to preside over the imprisonment of multiple Al Jazeera
journalists whose only crime was doing actual journalism and scores of
other Egyptian journalists that never get mentioned in the news media.
Another thing that I think is really absent from a lot of the
coverage of the aftermath of this horrific massacre is that France also
is a surveillance state. And France has a very Islamophobic position
toward their immigrant community, but also toward second- and
third-generation Arabs or people from other Muslim countries who have
settled inside of France. And there’s going to be an
intense -- intensification of an already overreaching surveillance system
inside of France.
You know, some months ago
I was on the show talking about the U.S. watchlisting system, and one
of the things that we heard when we were doing this report on how you
end up on the no-fly list or on the watchlist was that people within the
U.S. counterterrorism community, who are actually trying to prevent
acts of terrorism from happening, say that they’re flooded in
information and that if everyone is on the watchlist, effectively no one
is on the watchlist when it comes to actually looking at who might be
engaged in these kinds of terror plots.
A similar phenomenon is happening in Paris, France. You know, people
talk about an intelligence failure, an intelligence breakdown. When you
are putting people on these lists for monitoring or surveillance based
on flimsy or circumstantial evidence, what that means is that you
overload your own bureaucracy. So, on the one hand, you have a
surveillance state that unfairly targets Muslims and immigrants, in both
the United States and in France, and on the other hand, you have a
system that is intended to stop acts of terrorism or to monitor people
that are plotting acts of terrorism that has become its own hindrance,
its own biggest obstacle to actually figuring out the reality of these
plots.
And let’s remember, while horrifying and reprehensible, these
incidents represent a relatively minor threat to Western society. You
know, in terms of the actual threats facing our society, this doesn’t
even rank in the top five. And so, you know, to have this kind of a
reaction is not only a waste of a tremendous amount of money, but it is
going to encourage, I think, future acts of terrorism.
Jeremy Scahill is co-founder of The Intercept. His books include Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army and Dirty Wars: The World is a Battlefield
In Lebanon, a Syrian girl
stands behind a door at a refugee camp in the village of Ketermaya. A
storm raged across the Middle East this week raising concerns for Syrian
refugees facing freezing temperatures in makeshift shelters: photo by Ali Hashisho/Reuters, 10 January 2015
Palestinian children look out through holes in a sheet at their family’s house, which was damaged by Israeli shelling during the 50-day war last summer. Since the war, thousands are still living in UN shelters and damaged homes and power is on for only six hours a day: photo by Mohammed Salem/Reuters, 10 January 2015
Afghan refugee children gather their goats in heavy fog on the outskirts of Islamabad, Pakistan: photo by Muhammed Muheisen/AP, 10 January 2015
Hundreds of Muslims attend Friday prayers during the first day of the three-day long Muslim congregation at Tongi, Dhaka, Bangladesh: photo by Abir Abdullah/EPA, 10 January 2015
Fear spread in France after the country’s bloodiest attack in half a century. In Villefranche-sur-Saône, forensic police officers scour the scene at a kebab shop damaged following an explosion near a mosque: photo byJean-Philippe Ksiazek/AFP, 10 January 2015
There was a shoot-out between the two suspects of the Charlie Hebdo attack and the police on the N2 motorway. The gunmen eventually took refuge in a printing works on an industrial estate in Dammartin-en-Goële. In this photograph, smoke rises as a special forces soldier enters the building where the suspects had taken refuge. They were both killed during the raid by the special forces: photo by Christopher Furlong via The Guardian, 10 January 2015
Islam is as dangerous in a man as rabies in a dog. - Sir Winston Churchill #islam: image via 1ForHealth 1 @forhealth1, 9 January 2015
Horrendous oppression #Islam: While entering and leaving the mosque #Uyghurs are supposed to show their ‘mosque cards’: image via Voice of Uyghurs @VoiceUyghur, 6 January 2015
Horrendous oppression #Islam: While entering and leaving the mosque #Uyghurs are supposed to show their ‘mosque cards’: image via Voice of Uyghurs @VoiceUyghur, 6 January 2015
Anti-Islamic marches are gaining support in Germany following the #CharlieHebdo attacks: image via VICE News @vicenews, 12 January 2015
An anti-Islam rally in Germany drew 25,000 protesters in wake of the attack on #CharlieHebdo attacks: image via Fusion @ThisIsFusion, 12 January 2015
White privilege is the ability to look at this #CharlieHebdo comic and somehow not understand that it’s deeply racist: image via Jonathan McIntosh @radicalbytes, 12 January 2015
A Bahraini protester stands in a cloud of teargas during a confrontation with police on the outskirts of Manama after a demonstration against the arrest of the head of the Shia opposition movement Al-Wefaq, Sheikh Ali Salman: photo by Mohammed Al-Shaikh/AFP, 10 January 2015
8 comments:
One news story headline at the time -- doesn't it already seem so long ago? -- described the front phalanx in the Paris march as composed of "free world leaders", a phrase which even then had an odd ring to it.
Neil Young: Rockin' in the Free World
It isn't the prettiest line up I've ever seen.
This coming year isn't looking so good.
Well, you've got to concede that were it not for the brazen show of smirking and larking on the part of Bibi's battery of beefy bodyguards (lacking only the jackboots), this contrived little cortège might have been the gloomiest bit of p.r. in history -- but hey, everybody loves a parade, nobody more than the killer clown at the front.
Does anybody really wonder why it is that among the million refugees escaping westward and northward in the past year, for all the disparity of background and circumstance, the one commonly agreed and stated preference, as to destination, has been a negative one -- "anywhere but France". (One thinks of Rimbaud -- "anywhere out of this world"...)
Hitchhiking near Lille in 1964 I was picked up by a group of Moroccans and Algerian migrant workers returning from a factory job in Belgium. I was appointed as guide, and asked to interpret road signs -- "droit, gauche, tout droit" pretty much covered the full range of required translation -- so that they would have to stop no more than necessary, and never for more than moments, in the course of getting to the Spanish border. Pausing anywhere in France they considered out of the question, much too fraught.
(One of them had overstayed his work permit, and once we had got across to North Africa, I, in my protected innocence/ignorance, was shocked to learn the consequences, for him, of overstaying -- a bloody beating in the customs shop at the border, stoically endured by this veteran of colonialist terror as business-as-usual.)
Hollande's calcified slumpy-frowny-face expression all through this year of sombre staged photo-ops has curiously etched itself into his public identity so deeply it's impossible any more for me to even gaze upon him without recalling a sad "pet" turtle I was given as a christmas present one year toward the end of that war in which the brave French distinguished themselves by sinking their own fleet at Toulon, then madly cooperating with their conquerors to await developments. That pathetic little animal had a Murican flag painted on its back. At least no one had thought to paint the iconic tricoleur on the backs of patriotic petshop turtles. The poor wee beasts just accepted their fate of being owned and perverted because they had to, forever. Unlike, say, those unruly Algerians.
That captive turtle survived maybe three days in a bowl atop the old piled-coil-top refrigerator before giving up the ghost. Do pet turtles get to have souls?
Trump recently came out with sympathetic grunts and noises when asked about Putin's practice of killing journalists. But kidnapping, torturing, imprisoning, and killing journalists is really passe when the establishment media are all corporate-owned and completely disinclined from engaging in actual journalism. That's one reason why Bernie Sanders gets almost no coverage in the mainstream media. It just may be that on so many fronts we are totally fucked.
It seems Trump's way is to insult, humiliate, embarrass, and threaten the "news media" into craven submission. So far the only case I've seen of a journalist standing up to him was the episode when the respected Mexican news anchor Jorge Ramos attempted to pursue an inconvenient line of questioning re. Trump's immigration "policy", and Trump's thugs quickly closed in for a bit of that "roughing up" which is applied to those regarded as nuisances. Ramos did not like that, and wrote a tough, pointed response in which he presented a vision of "Trumplandia", as seen from the other side of the wall.
But with American journalists there exists neither the means nor indeed the will to resist in that fashion. Meghan Kelly, a previous victim of Trump's tactical anger, works for Fox, after all, and from the way she managed to suck it up when assaulted by the Donald, it appears she would like to go on doing so.
Even more effective than killing or jailing journalists is intimidating them, instilling the understanding that there are potential dangers for a reporter who brings back the wrong (i.e. real) news, if that news happens not to fit into the world picture drawn and maintained by the employing agency and/or its political masters.
And too, perhaps more insidiously still, there is the everpresent knowledge that free speech may well be more seriously endangered in the supposedly sacrosanct "ivy towers" of academia, where no drone employee is in fact free to speak without fear of administrative reprisal. Last week I heard an interview with Stephen Solaita, who lost his job at U. of Illinois for tweeting (on his private twitter account, no academic affiliation given) to the effect that the West Bank settlements might well not be the greatest thing that ever happened to the planet.
Solaita explained that IOF trolls had been tracking his account day and night for a year until finding that one scrap which could be used to get him fired. His dismissal by the university came in the form of a computer refusal-of-entry notice.
He is now in Lebanon, out of work.
The message sent and lesson learned is pretty clear: if you are fortunate enough, in these mad times, to have a mind, try not to use it in public.
I think this goes not only for journalists, some of whom do thankfully continue to take risks to bring back the hard stories, but for academics, who, to my possibly limited comprehension, are all about avoiding risk, in any circumstance.
Solaita explained that he had learned the hard way that it is career suicide in an American university to speak a word of truth about Israel.
For me, it's all but impossible to find any honest coverage of world events in a context so shaped and dominated by prejudice and private money interests. The absurd "solidarity march", with the Junckers and Sisis arm and arm with Bibi and tucked in safely among all those obvious security thugs, far from the madding crowd, provides a canvas splashed from one edge of the frame to the other with lies.
The construction of the frame was the efficient work of the world media.
It's hard not to like Bernie, just as, a half century ago, it was hard not to like George McGovern or Gene McCarthy. But hope -- I fear there never was any. Capitalism is capitalism. Capitalism's what made America the way it is. Bernie's a socialist. Fifty years from now, if there's an America, and a world for America to be in, maybe his name will be the answer to a trivia question.
But you know how much Americans hate history.
On the other hand, here's a bit of real investigative reporting -- good enough to have caused a surprising holiday outbreak of twisted knickers among those who have something (even maybe a lot) invested in the idea that the most important thing in life is scoring big with balls:
Al Jazeera: The Dark Side: The Secret World of Sports Doping
Happy New Year! I was momentarily confused by the caption of the first of the German pics, obviously showing protest against the march rather than the march itself. The visual skills are still a bit sluggish after Xmas!
Michael, thank you for that useful clarification. I had misgivings about reproducing a caption which may have been misleading -- the event shown is obviously NOT a PEGIDA rally, but an anti-PEGIDA demonstration -- I suppose I should have reached into the works and provided an explanatory caption.
The acronym stands for Patriotische Europäer Gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes (Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West).
For those who don't know -- Americans, I suppose that would mean -- PEGIDA is a German anti-Islamic political movement, founded in Dresden in 2014 by a p.r. guy named Lutz Bachmann (who has characterized migrants as "animals", "scumbags" and "trash"), which held weekly Monday demonstrations against Muslim immigration from the autumn of last year into the early months of this year.
The movement then was briefly banned and lapsed into recessive mode until revived by resistance, particularly in the former East Germany, against the growing wave of migrants over the summer. At PEGIDA's anniversary event on 19 October 2015, keynote speaker Akif Pirinçci described the Muslim refugees as alien invaders, and Germany as a "Muslim garbage dump."
PEGIDA (Facebook page/official website)
Post a Comment